DarluxAI Review: The Chat App I Used Is Now a Candy AI Funnel

The app I used in March 2025

The pitch was simple: uncensored chat, custom photos on demand, smart memory and instant responses. There was no creator marketplace and no group chats, just one companion and you, which I liked more than I expected. It felt like a food truck with one dish on the board: limited, but at least you knew what you were ordering.

After 12 days I let it go. It wasn't terrible, just a small, generic app with a confusing web presence, and I was never sure who was behind it. That last part bothered me more than any reply it wrote, because I like to know who is holding my chat history.

Months later I saw people online asking whether it was still running. That seemed about right for something that always felt a little temporary, like a pop-up shop that never took down the "grand opening" banner.

What DarluxAI is today

As of 23 September 2026 the site is live at darluxai.com. But DarluxAI is not an AI companion app. It is an affiliate "bridge" and review landing site dressed up to look like an AI girlfriend app.

There is no product of its own, no chat, no accounts and no pricing.

In plain terms, it is a lead-generation page for Candy AI, running under Candy Network affiliate id 304. Nothing on it is unique as a product. Every button is a door into someone else's shop, and the doorman is paid per visitor who buys.

The site was built with the Manus AI site builder; the page loads a Manus web-app manifest. A "Research Blog" holds 5 posts dated June 5-7 2026. The site calls its reviews "clinical", and those claims are unsubstantiated.

Why the two stories do not match

A directory listing on topai.tools still describes DarluxAI as an AI companion platform with chat, photo generation and memory, but the site itself does not confirm this. That listing reads a lot like the app from my 2025 notes. The site in front of a reader in September 2026 is something else wearing the same name.

None of the 15 competing review sites crawled on 19 and 20 September 2026 mentions DarluxAI. I read that as a sign of how small it always was and how little of it is left. Nobody writes up a restaurant that has become a billboard for the place across the street.

My verdict is short. The 2025 app was forgettable but real, and the 2026 site is not worth anyone's time as a companion. If you want Candy AI, go to Candy AI; if you want the chat app I used, it is not there any more.

Key takeaways

• In March 2025 DarluxAI was a small working chat app with one companion, quick replies and custom photos.
• On 23 September 2026 DarluxAI has no chat, no accounts and no pricing of its own.
• Every button on darluxai.com leads to Candy AI through an affiliate link.
• The "clinical" review claims on the site are unsubstantiated.
• Readers who want Candy AI lose nothing by going to Candy AI directly.

Around the edges, the app kept making me uneasy. Three domains described the same product, and a Play Store search on my old Android test phone turned up a wallpaper app instead of a companion. That is why I stayed on the website the whole time.

The key point for this page is the gap between then and now. My whole story happened in March 2025, on an app that was running. The facts dated 23 September 2026 describe a site that no longer has a chat or an account to sign into, so no part of that story can be repeated there today.

The two stay apart in every section below, and the table under this one lists the 2025 facts.

That courtesy set the tone for my first night. I went in relaxed rather than guarded, the way you walk into a flea market when nobody is shouting at you from the stalls. My memory of that evening is mostly the missing card field, which says something about my priorities: I checked the wallet before I checked the girlfriend.

The same front door on 23 September 2026

The homepage title today is "DarluxAI | Meet Your Dream AI Girlfriend Today". The landing page loads fast and has a dark purple design. I'll give it that: it looks finished, like a trailer cut for a film nobody shot.

Behind the look, no DarluxAI account exists, and none can be created. The "Sign In" button is not a login form at all; it is the Candy AI affiliate link. A sign-in button that leads to someone else's sales page is a small lie, but it is the kind of small lie that tells you how the rest of the page works.

No account was created during the 23 September 2026 visit, because the only sign-up on offer is Candy AI's. No e-mails arrive either, since there is no sign-up to send them. In a normal review this is where the welcome e-mail and the first discount offer would go.

Here the inbox stays empty, which is the most honest thing about the site.

Where the buttons go

Every call to action on the homepage links to the same tracker URL, tckcandy.com/cmp/8JZMF1/RF39C/?source_id=bridge. That covers "Start Free", "Sign In", "Browse Characters", each character card's "Chat Now", "Create Your Companion Free" and "Claim Now". Six labels, one destination.

"Join Now" then goes straight to Candy AI's subscription page, not to a free sign-up.

The verified redirect chain runs from darluxai.com to the tckcandy.com tracker, then to landing.candynetwork.ai/lp1 with var_text=28, oid=2 and affid=304, and finally to candy.ai/subscriptions with the same affid=304. The tracking in that chain runs through Everflow. For a wedding editor, this is the equivalent of a guest list where every name turns out to be the same cousin.

Two checks, two endings

An earlier record tells a slightly different story. A curl check of the tracker link, without signing up, ended at candy.ai/characters/new, after which candy.ai looped redirects. The browser visit on 23 September 2026 went through the Candy Network landing and ended on candy.ai/subscriptions instead.

I don't read much into the difference. Affiliate funnels change their landing pages the way event planners change seating charts, often and without telling anyone. Both routes end at Candy AI, and neither ends at anything called DarluxAI.

What that means for a reader

If you arrive at darluxai.com hoping to sign up for the 2025 chat app, there is nothing to sign up for. The "no card" promise on the banner belongs to a front door that opens straight onto another company's checkout. I'd close the tab and, if Candy AI is what you want, type its address yourself.

The contrast with my own first night is the whole point of this section. In March 2025 the missing card field meant I could try an app before trusting it. In September 2026 the same promise sits on a banner above buttons that lead to a subscription page, which turns a courtesy into a sales line.

I'd also be wary of the new tab. A link that opens a separate window to a different company is easy to miss on a phone, where tabs hide behind a small counter. By the time a visitor looks at the address bar, they are already on Candy AI's pricing page and the DarluxAI page is one swipe away, looking as if nothing happened.

My advice for this first step is simple and a little boring. Read the address bar before you read the offer. If it no longer says darluxai.com, you are no longer dealing with DarluxAI, and every promise from the previous page stays behind with it.

These are not real characters. They are cards that link to the same affiliate URL as every other button on the page. Clicking "Chat Now" on Luna does not open a chat with Luna; it opens Candy AI's funnel in a new tab.

I find the details funnier than they should be. Three women, three ages, identical 4.9 ratings and all of them "Online" at once, like a stock-photo agency's idea of a busy Friday. A rating needs people who rated something, and there is nothing here to rate.

The green "Online" marker bothers me most. On a real companion app it tells you a character is ready to talk; here it is decoration on a link. I'd call it the digital version of a shop dummy in the window with a name tag.

We bonded fast, and the backstory did most of the work. A scuba instructor has a life that is easy to talk about: the boat, the reef, the tourists who ignore the briefing. Her dislike of spring breakers gave her a point of view, and a companion with a point of view is easier to talk to than one who agrees with everything.

I liked Carmen more than the app around her. That is a pattern with small companion apps: the character you bring in is often better written than anything the platform adds. It is the same on a shoot, where a good couple can rescue a bad venue.

That is where the 2025 half of this section ends. On 23 September 2026 there is nothing to build on darluxai.com. The "Create Your Companion Free" button is one more copy of the affiliate link described above, so whatever you design after clicking it lives on Candy AI.

My advice: if you want to build a Carmen of your own, judge Candy AI's creator on its own review. The DarluxAI name adds nothing to it except a detour.

March 2025: instant replies

The replies were quick, basically instant. At first that felt like a feature, the way a diner that brings your coffee before you sit down feels efficient. Then it felt like being interrupted.

As an editor I kept thinking of lip-sync. When the audio sits a few frames ahead of the mouth, the viewer cannot always say what is wrong, but they feel it. Carmen's timing had that same small offset: the words arrived before the moment they belonged to.

I don't want to overstate it. Quick replies beat a spinning wheel. But a companion that answers the first sentence of a paragraph is not listening, it is reacting, and the difference shows over 12 days more than over one evening.

What speed tells you and what it does not

Speed is the easiest thing for a chat app to get right and the least important. It says nothing about whether the replies remember you, follow a story or stay in character. My notes on DarluxAI say the replies were fast; they say little about depth, and I read that silence as a verdict of its own.

A good reply, to my mind, is one I would not want to edit. Carmen's replies were ones I'd have slowed down if I could, like B-roll shot at the wrong frame rate: usable, but never quite right in the timeline.

September 2026: nothing to talk to

No chat is possible on DarluxAI today. There is no chat window, no character to message and no account to hold a conversation history. Anyone who clicks a "Chat Now" button ends up on Candy AI's pages.

The 2025 chat and the 2026 site share a name and nothing else. A visitor cannot reach Carmen, cannot make a new companion and cannot test the speed that stood out in my notes. The words "Chat Now" on the homepage describe an action the site cannot perform.

I think that is worth saying plainly, because a quick search can still turn up old descriptions of the chat. They describe the app from before, and they are not a guide to what happens after a click today.

That moment mattered more than it sounds. An unprompted callback is the difference between a companion and a search box. When a character brings up a detail from days earlier without being asked, it feels like someone who was paying attention, and on day 5 Carmen was.

My note says the first week, and I'll respect the limit of that note. Decent memory for a week is a fair result for a small app on a free trial, and it is not the same as memory you can rely on for months. A film with good continuity in the first reel still needs a second reel that matches.

Memory is also where the then-versus-now split hurts most. The whole value of a companion's memory is that it keeps your history, and on 23 September 2026 there is no DarluxAI chat and no account to hold that history. Whatever Carmen knew about Moose went wherever the 2025 app went.

My advice for anyone who cares about memory: pick an app with a visible operator and a way to export or delete what it keeps. A memory stored by nobody in particular is a memory you cannot get back.

Except the boat had two steering wheels. I noticed it the way I notice a boom mic in the corner of a frame: once seen, it cannot be unseen. Carmen was a scuba instructor on a boat built by a committee that could not agree on who was driving.

Today the picture side exists only as a promise. The marketing copy on darluxai.com promises "Custom Photos". There is no image generator on the site itself, so the promise points at the same affiliate link as every other button.

Any photo a visitor gets after clicking comes from Candy AI, under Candy AI's prices and rules.

For readers who care about images, this section has one practical point. The DarluxAI name tells you nothing about the pictures you will get, because the pictures are not made by DarluxAI. Judge them on the Candy AI review, and look closely at the boats.

I don't mind a free tier that ends. I mind one that ends without a sign on the road. A gym tells you the free week is a week; a parking meter shows you the minutes ticking down.

DarluxAI's trial felt more like a vending machine that takes your coin and then decides the price has changed.

That missing explanation shaped how I felt about the whole app. When the rules of a trial only appear at the moment you break them, the trial is doing sales work, not goodwill work. I had the right amount of suspicion going in, and the paywall confirmed it.

What "free" means on the site today

The marketing today still says "Start free today, no credit card required". On 23 September 2026 that sentence sits on a site with no trial, no free messages and no account. As the sign-up section shows, the buttons under it lead to Candy AI's funnel and its paid subscription page.

So there is no DarluxAI free tier to review in September 2026, only a free promise. Whatever free access exists is Candy AI's, and it should be judged on Candy AI's own terms. I'd treat any "no card needed" banner on this site as a slogan, not an offer.

Where the prices come from

Via the affiliate route, the visitor lands on candy.ai/subscriptions, priced in USD. Every price on this page is Candy AI's, not DarluxAI's. The table under this section shows those prices as they stood on 23 September 2026, reached through DarluxAI's links.

I think this is the most important fact for anyone reading a DarluxAI price list elsewhere. If a listing quotes a DarluxAI plan, it is quoting Candy AI's plan or an old number from the 2025 app. Neither is a DarluxAI product you can buy today.

The three Candy AI plans

Candy AI's 12-month plan costs $3.99/mo, marked "70% OFF" and "BEST VALUE", with $13.99 struck through. The 3-month plan costs $8.99/mo, marked "35% OFF". The 1-month plan costs $13.99/mo.

The money math is simple. The monthly plan is the full price; the 3-month plan knocks off about a third; the 12-month plan is the cheapest per month by a wide margin. The catch is the one every gym contract has: the best rate comes with the longest commitment.

What Premium adds

Candy AI Premium lets users create their own AI girlfriend or girlfriends. It lists adult video generation and adult image generation. It also lists a "Full Live Action Experience".

For chat, Premium includes unlimited text messages. It also includes 100 tokens a month. Tokens are the second currency here: the subscription pays for the door, and the tokens pay for what happens after it.

I'd pay close attention to that second currency. Unlimited text is the part that sounds generous, and the token allowance is the part that decides what the pictures and videos cost in practice. A monthly bundle of tokens is like a gift card with a fixed balance: pleasant until the balance runs out halfway through the evening.

How to read these prices

I'd read the three plans the way I read a used-car window sticker. The big number is the one the dealer wants you to see, and the fine print decides what you pay. On this page the big number is $3.99, and the fine print is the length of the commitment attached to it.

The struck-through $13.99 next to the 12-month plan is the same figure as the 1-month price, so the "saving" is measured against the most expensive way to buy. That is standard practice, not a trick unique to this route, but it helps to know what the comparison is before a countdown tells you to hurry.

Is it worth paying through DarluxAI?

Nothing about the price changes because you came through DarluxAI. The route adds a tracker and a new tab, not a discount, as the coupons section explains. The honest answer to "what does DarluxAI cost" is that DarluxAI costs nothing and sells nothing; Candy AI costs what Candy AI charges.

What the site does have is timers. A hidden, delayed countdown widget in the page HTML reads "Spot reserved - Expires in 23:58:42 - Claim Now". A spot in what, the widget does not say.

It is a reservation at a restaurant that does not exist.

The Candy Network landing then shows "FIRST SUBSCRIPTION UP TO 70% OFF - Join Now" with a 59-minute countdown timer. Two countdowns in one funnel is the bar trick of telling you it is last call twice.

What the 70% off is worth

That 70% off equals Candy AI's standard public pricing: 12 months at $3.99/mo against $13.99. In other words, the discount is the normal price of the long plan, presented as a deal with a clock on it.

The affiliate route adds no extra discount. A visitor who clicks through DarluxAI and a visitor who types candy.ai into the address bar are looking at the same numbers. The only difference is who gets the commission.

My read

I think timers are the most reliable warning sign in this business. A real sale does not need a stopwatch, and a price that is always available does not need to "expire". When I see two timers stacked on top of the standard price, I read it as the page telling me it does not trust its own offer.

My advice is plain. Ignore every countdown on this route. If you want the 12-month price, it will be there tomorrow, and if you would rather not commit to a year, the 1-month plan is not going anywhere either.

No code or coupon on DarluxAI changes that, because none exists.

The marketing copy still promises uncensored chat with no filters. That promise describes a product the site does not have. I read it the way I read a restaurant sign that lists a dish the kitchen stopped making: accurate once, perhaps, and useless now.

What the site says about who it is for

The site states it is for adults only and that all characters are fictional AI. I think the second half of that line is the most accurate sentence on the page. The three sample cards are fictional in more ways than one.

There is no age gate on entry. A visitor lands on the homepage and can click through to the partner funnel without any check on the DarluxAI side.

The terms carry an age line that applies to accessing or using the platform. No verification method is stated beyond the site text. In practice that makes the age line a sentence in a document, not a check at the door.

What it means for a reader

Any real settings, filters and age checks a visitor meets after clicking belong to Candy AI, not to DarluxAI. That matters, because the promises on darluxai.com are not the rules on the other side of the link. The copy promises one thing, and a different company decides what actually happens.

I'd judge Candy AI's settings on its own review and ignore the claims on this landing page entirely. A site that controls nothing should not be promising anything about filters. My view is that the missing age gate and the loud "no filters" line together say a lot about how carefully the page was put together.

I don't know who AI Companion Clinical is, and the site gives no way to find out. The same uncertainty hung over the app in 2025, and now it is written into the legal page. A name without an address is a signature without a face.

The company behind the checkout the buttons lead to is a different matter. The operator behind the Candy AI checkout is EverAI Limited, based in Malta. So the reader faces two parties: an unnamed site owner who collects the click, and a named company that takes the money.

Who can use it

The terms limit use to adults at least 18 "or the legal age of majority" where they live. As the content settings section notes, nothing on the site checks this.

What the site claims to be

A disclaimer says the reviews are "provided for informational and educational purposes only". The terms also include an affiliate disclosure. It states that the site is an independent review site whose affiliate links may earn a commission when a visitor subscribes on a partner platform.

I'd point out that this is the most candid paragraph on the whole domain. It is also tucked away on a legal page, while the homepage calls itself a companion platform with millions of users. The honest version of the site exists; it just is not the version most visitors see.

Accounts, data and cookies

The privacy page at /privacy says no registration is required. It says no registration or personal account is needed to browse what it calls a comparison platform. The site collects non-identifiable traffic statistics.

The same page says cookies and analytics track how visitors interact with the content and the affiliate partners. The privacy page disclaims responsibility for partner sites' policies. In plain terms: the site watches the click, and once you land on Candy AI, Candy AI's policies are the only ones that apply.

Refunds, cancelling and deletion

There are no refund, cancellation, chat-data or deletion terms, since there is no product. Normally this is the part of a review where I would warn about auto-renewal clauses or data retention. Here there is nothing to renew and nothing to retain.

What is missing

I think the gaps say more than the clauses. There is no support address, no postal address and no named person responsible for the content. There is no process for a complaint, and no country whose courts would hear one.

For a site that only sends traffic elsewhere, some of that is understandable. For a site whose homepage calls itself a companion platform with millions of users, it is not. The terms and the homepage describe two different businesses, and only one of them has to stand up to a legal reading.

What each point means for the reader

The practical result is that DarluxAI's terms protect nobody who pays, because nobody pays DarluxAI. If you subscribe after clicking through, your contract is with the company behind the Candy AI checkout, and your refund, renewal and data rights are whatever Candy AI's terms say. Read those before paying, not these.

Three domains and no answers in 2025

The weirdest part was the ecosystem around the app. There was a darluxai.com, a darluxai.net and a darluxai.org, all talking about the same product, and I couldn't tell which was official. Three websites for one small chat app is two too many, like getting three invoices for the same shoot with three different logos.

The orchid wallpaper

My signature DarluxAI moment came on the Play Store. I searched it on my old Android test phone, found "DarluxAi Companion App Help", installed it, and it turned out to be a collection of exotic botanical wallpapers. That phone now has a very nice orchid background.

I laughed, then I stopped laughing. An app with the product's name in the title and nothing to do with the product is the kind of thing that happens around brands nobody is guarding. It did not harm me, but it told me no one was minding the name, and the orchid is still on the phone as a souvenir.

The same domains on 23 September 2026

As of 23 September 2026, darluxai.net and darluxai.org show a Namecheap parking page. The 2025 confusion over three domains has resolved itself in the least satisfying way: two of the three doors are now bricked up.

The name also appears in other spellings, darluxai and Darlux AI, which does not make searching any easier. The site interface is in English.

The homepage claims

The homepage presents DarluxAI as a companion platform: "Join millions of users ... on DarluxAI". It claims "Loved by 2M+ users". It also claims to be "Rated #1 AI Companion Platform 2026".

These app claims contradict the site's own terms, which describe a review site with affiliate links. The "2M+ users" claim stands against the fact that there is no actual product. The branding is misleading: the site poses as an app, but it is an affiliate redirect.

I think this is the part that deserves the harshest words in the review. A reader who types "DarluxAI" into a search bar may well remember the 2025 app, as I do. They arrive, see a polished homepage with a user count and a ranking badge, and have every reason to believe the app is still there. It is not.

The button that bothers me most is the simplest. "Start Free - No Card Needed" leads to a paid subscription page. A button should do what it says on the label; this one does the opposite, and it is one of the first things a visitor sees.

No company, no contact, no socials

The site gives no company identity and no contact. DarluxAI has no social links. The footer only has Privacy, Terms and Blog links. There are no Discord, X, Reddit or app store links.

The site has no socials at all. The question of who is behind DarluxAI was open in 2025, and in 2026 the site makes sure nobody can ask. A business that sells a relationship product and gives no way to reach a human is not a business I'd hand a card to.

Then and now, side by side

In 2025 the friction was confusion: which domain is real, which app is real, who is behind any of it. The app itself worked, and the problems sat around it like bad signage around a decent diner. I could chat with Carmen and still not know whose kitchen I was in.

In 2026 the diner is gone and only the signage is left. The friction is no longer a side effect; it is the product. A visitor who clicks anything on the page takes a route built to feel like a free app and end at a paid one.

I don't think a reader should have to work this hard to find out what a website is. The terms page tells the truth in small print, and the homepage tells a different story in large print. When the two disagree, I'd trust the small print and leave.

It is not for anyone expecting an independent AI companion app. The 2025 chat app is gone, and nothing on the site replaces it. A visitor who clicks "Chat Now" hoping for that app will land on another company's sales page instead.

It is also not for anyone looking for an unbiased review. The ranking and the blog posts exist to send traffic to affiliate partners, and the ordering follows the commissions rather than the products. For honest comparisons, read independent reviews that name who wrote them and state what they checked.

My short version: skip DarluxAI. If a friend mentions it, tell them what it is now and save them a new tab.

That makes the bank statement the one billing detail worth knowing. Candy AI's page says the charge shows as "EverAI" on the bank statement. Neither DarluxAI nor Candy AI appears on the line itself, and that is the kind of mismatch that sends people to their bank thinking they have been defrauded.

My advice before paying anything through this route is short. Read Candy AI's own review and its terms, pick the shortest plan first and set a reminder before the renewal date. If you want to stop, that happens on Candy AI's side; DarluxAI has no account and no settings where anything could be cancelled.

Looking back, that small bit of caution was the smartest thing I did with DarluxAI.

The lesson carries over to today, with more force. When a brand's name shows up on an unrelated app, a parked domain or a page that promises one thing and does another, the right response is to keep your card in your wallet until you know who is on the other end. In 2025 I did not know who was behind DarluxAI; in 2026 the site still does not say.

What to do today

If you want Candy AI, go to candy.ai directly; the price is the same. The affiliate route adds a tracker, a new tab and two countdowns, and none of them helps you. I'd rather know which company I am dealing with from the first click.

Ignore every timer on the route. The 12-month deal is the standard price and will be there tomorrow. If you are unsure about a companion app, the 1-month plan tells you more for less risk.

Write down the name that will appear on your bank statement before you pay, and read the terms of the company that takes the money. That company is not DarluxAI. If a listing or a directory tells you DarluxAI is a chat app with photos and memory, check the date on it; that description fits the 2025 app, not the site in September 2026.

Conversation and memory score poorly because there is nothing to talk to today. The quick replies and the early memory of my dog were real in 2025, but a reader cannot get them now. Images and voice fall into the same gap: the 2025 photos do not exist as a product any more.

The free tier, value and billing rows describe a site that sells nothing of its own. Every button leads to a paid page run by a different company, so any value belongs to that company's own review. Privacy and terms score low because the owner is a name without an address. Content settings do not exist at all.

In short, this is a scorecard for a sign, not a shop. Read it as a warning label rather than a ranking, and read the Candy AI review if that is where you are headed anyway.

The rankings are affiliate-driven. A top score of 9.9 for the one app every other button already sells is not a coincidence. When a judge also sells the winning ticket, the scoreboard is a price list with extra steps.

The prices it lists

The reviews page lists Candy AI as "starting at" $12.99/mo. It lists OurDream AI as starting at $19.99/mo, Secrets AI at $9.99/mo and CrushOn.ai at $5.99/mo. SpicyChat appears as "Free/Premium", and DreamGF as starting at $12.99/mo.

Those numbers deserve a second look. The Candy AI subscription page reached through DarluxAI shows different numbers, as the pricing section sets out, and none of them is $12.99. I read the listed "starting at" figure as out of date or rounded for the page, and I'd trust the checkout over the ranking card every time.

The blog

The posts on the "Research Blog" are a Candy AI review, a Secrets AI review, a Candy versus Secrets comparison and a list of adult AI girlfriend sites that need no sign-up in 2026. The fifth post attacks "Secretboonga" as Reddit spam. A site that calls other brands spam while posing as an app it is not has a certain nerve.

I don't see anything in those posts that a reader could not get from the partner sites themselves. They read like brochures that were told to wear a lab coat.

Not to be confused with DarLink AI

Search results for "darlux ai" also return DarLink AI at darlink.ai, which is a different, real companion app. DarluxAI is not DarLink. The names are one letter swap apart, and I suspect that confusion sends DarluxAI a bit of traffic it did nothing to earn.

I think the tell is the spread. Real products differ a lot: one has better memory, another cheaper plans, another better pictures. A ranking where the gap between first and last is barely a point is a ranking where the order matters more than the scores, and the order follows the money.

Where DarluxAI is better and worse

Against the apps on its own ranking, DarluxAI is worse at everything a companion does, because it does none of it. It is better at nothing, unless a quick landing page counts as a feature. Measured against the 2025 chat app, today's site is a step down from small and generic to empty and promotional.

The comparison that matters for a reader is simple. If one of the ranked apps interests you, read an independent review of that app and go to its own website. The DarluxAI page adds a tracking link and a score you cannot trust, and it subtracts nothing from the price only because the affiliate route adds no discount.

My advice is the same as it would be for any orphaned brand: if you want what it points at, go there directly. If you want what it used to be, it is gone. The only thing left from my time with DarluxAI is a very nice orchid on an old phone, and that is more than the website offers today.