EverAI (company, not a separate consumer app): Who Runs Candy AI

This page is about the company behind the app: who runs it, where it is registered, what it says about itself and what that means for your money and your data. I'd call it the end credits of the film. Few people read them, but they tell you who actually made the thing.

What everai.ai actually is

The site at everai.ai is live. It is a corporate one-pager only, with no login and no product. The page is a static marketing page with Vision, About, Careers and Contact sections, and there is no product demo.

That last point is the one I kept coming back to when I looked the company up. EverAI's own website didn't mention a single app by name; it talked about 'the world's largest AI companionship platform' and a goal of 500 million users. It read like a startup pitch deck with the product cropped out of every slide, which is an odd choice for a company whose product sells on looks.

Contact runs through the e-mail address [email protected] and a Google Form. The company has a LinkedIn page, but everai.ai links no X, Discord or Instagram account. The Discord server that does exist belongs to Candy.ai.

Support is split the same way. The Candy.ai Help Center sits on a Zendesk address under the EverAI name, everai.zendesk.com. A separate Trust & Safety centre at helloeverai.zendesk.com has the categories 'Content Policies' and 'Trust and Safety', so the company name hides in the web addresses even where the app name is on the page.

One brand, one flagship

No other consumer brand turns up on everai.ai, on the careers board or in search. One review site, ai-girlfriend-review.com, says Yume AI, an anime companion platform, is operated by EverAI Limited of Malta, as checked on 19 September 2026. That claim has not been checked against Yume's own terms, so I'd treat it as a lead, not a fact.

There is no EverAI app in the App Store: a search for 'everai' returns only unrelated apps, such as 'Everi' by an individual developer. The domain everai.app is parked and for sale on Spaceship.com, and everai.com and everai.io did not respond. If a download page or a lookalike site claims to be the official EverAI app, I'd close the tab.

The old homepage, still online at /old-home, is headed 'Pioneering Conversational AI'. It describes an earlier positioning built on AI roleplay adventures, interactive gaming with AI characters and creative companions for writers. In its own words, the company specializes in conversational AI experiences for roleplay, gaming, social interactions and creative writing.

Put that next to today's one-pager and the pivot is plain. The writing-buddy pitch is gone, and companionship took the whole frame.

The people and the scale

The leadership is named, which is more than many operators in this corner of the market manage. Alexis Soulopoulos is CEO, and he co-founded Mad Paws. Michael Monin is Co-founder and CTO, Thomas Lacroix is Co-founder and CMO, and Marusa Fasano holds the CFO and legal role.

The careers board lives on Ashby at jobs.ashbyhq.com/everai. It lists 51 open roles, all of them fully remote, split into Growth (28) and R&D (23). The roles are based in Europe and Latin America.

The job ads claim '50 Million Users in 2 years - Help Us Reach 100M first, 500M next'. They also call the company 'One of the Top 15 Largest & Fastest-Growing AI Companies in the World' and give the team size as about 100 people.

By that claimed scale, EverAI is one of the largest AI-companion operators. I'd read the user number the way I read a venue's stated capacity: it probably counts every chair, including the ones in storage. Still, a company with 51 open roles and a team of about 100 is not a hobby project.

That machine has a history. When I dug into the company, I came across a Bellingcat investigation that found Candy.ai promoted on a site that grafts real people's faces onto fake videos. EverAI said the promotion came through its affiliate marketing program.

My job is making footage look real, so that one stuck with me.

What the check covered

The 23 September 2026 check covered the everai.ai links, the privacy and cookie policies, the old homepage, the Ashby careers board and one full job description. Third-party revenue estimates exist online, for example on getlatka and tripleminds, but they are inconsistent and unverified, so they are not used here.

Key takeaways: - An 'EverAI' charge on a card statement almost always means a Candy AI subscription or a token purchase. - everai.ai is a corporate one-pager with no login, no demo and no product name anywhere. - The company claims 50 million users and hires mostly for growth, affiliate and performance marketing. - The leadership is named, but the user and moderation claims come with few verifiable details. - For the chat, the pictures and the plans, read the Candy AI review; for billing, terms and data, read on.

The chats had their moments. When I told my brother Dan about it, he asked whether she at least remembered my birthday. She did, once, and then she congratulated me on it again four days later.

In April a charge from 'EverAI Ltd' showed up on my card, and my first thought was fraud. It wasn't fraud; it was me. I read the terms, found EverAI Limited of Malta named as the operator, and cancelled.

What stayed with me was the feeling, not the money. A fictional companion I'd been chatting with for three months was, legally speaking, a Maltese limited company. That is a hard thing to unlearn once you have read it in a contract.

So this page is less a review of an app than a review of the name on the receipt. The usage table has the short version of my three months, and the rest of the page explains the company that sent the bill.

The corporate site loads fast. That is easy when the page is a headline, a button and a short menu, but I'll give credit anyway.

Sign-up on Candy.ai opens a 'Create Free Account' modal that asks for an e-mail address and a password. The password must be at least 6 characters long. That is the security of a gym locker, so I'd pick something much longer and let a password manager carry it.

Candy.ai also offers sign-up with Google, Discord or a third social button. I'd think twice before tying a main Google account to a companion app. A separate address keeps the receipts and promo mails out of the inbox you use for work, and it makes leaving cleaner later.

What this means for the first night

The practical upshot is simple. Nobody has a first night with EverAI; the first night happens on Candy.ai, and EverAI shows up weeks later, on the statement. I think that gap is the whole problem with the brand: the company you meet at sign-up and the company that bills you go by different names.

If you read fine print at all, the first few minutes are the moment to do it. The legal pages sit a click away from the sign-up form, and they tell you who you are about to pay.

The home also has 'Romance Mode' characters. I read that as the gentler shelf, for people who want flirting and conversation more than media. I'd like that shelf to get more room, because it's the part that looks most like a companion and least like a product line.

Discovery works the way a shop window works. The filter chips make browsing quick, but they sort by looks first, which tells you what the product is optimised for. Finding a character with a strong personality means reading bios rather than trusting the filters.

I think that is the right place for the paywall from the company's side and the wrong one from the buyer's side. The creator is what makes a companion feel like yours, and you pay before you know whether it works for you. It is a bit like a wedding client paying the full deposit before seeing a single edited minute.

For anyone searching the EverAI name, the takeaway is practical. There is no separate EverAI creator, no EverAI character format and no EverAI export; whatever you build lives inside a Candy.ai Premium account. If you cancel that account, the character goes with it.

The Candy AI review walks through the builder itself, step by step.

How I'd judge the chat yourself

I'd judge any companion by the tenth reply, not the first. Opening lines are the trailer, and every studio cuts a good trailer. What counts is whether the character still sounds like itself once the conversation has wandered somewhere the script didn't plan for.

I'd also watch for continuity, the way an editor watches for a coffee cup that changes hands between two shots. A character who forgets a name, a job or a mood from an hour ago is a character on autopilot.

Then there is the question of tone. A product built around images and video, like this one, tends to steer conversation toward the next picture. I'd notice how often a reply ends with an invitation to spend, because that pattern tells you what the chat is for.

What the company side adds

The company side adds one thing to the chat: who reads it. The terms section below covers how user content is licensed, and I'd read it before typing anything personal. A conversation feels private because it happens at night on a small screen, but legally it sits on a server in someone else's building.

I told my brother Dan about my Candy AI companion, and his first question was the obvious one: 'did she at least remember your birthday?' She did, once. Then she congratulated me on it again four days later.

I laughed when it happened, and Dan laughed harder. In editing terms, it was a continuity error: the same scene cut into the timeline twice, with a different date on the clapperboard. A bot that did it was simply showing its seams.

That is the pattern I'd expect from most companion apps, and I don't count it as a scandal. It is a reminder that memory in these products is closer to a sticky note than a diary. If a companion remembers something important, I'd enjoy it and still keep my own notes.

Video is the centre of gravity

The rest of the home page leans the same way. There is a 'Candy Experiences - BUILD YOUR VIDEO' section and a 'Watch Candy Shorts' section of adult series, gated behind sign-up. There is also a 'Join Live Candy Cams' section with LIVE tiles.

Put together, Candy.ai extends well beyond chat into video: 'Live Action', Shorts series, 'Live Candy Cams' and build-your-video. I read that as a company that sees the chat as the lobby and the video as the main room.

How I read it as an editor

Video is my trade, so I'd look at this part with a colourist's squint. Generated video is hard to get right: hands drift, faces shift between shots, and lip-sync slips by a few frames. Any product that bets this heavily on video has to get those basics right, and I'd check them in the free preview material before paying.

The word 'Live' deserves a second look too. I'd want to know exactly what 'live' means on those tiles, and what it costs per minute, before tapping one. A label on a thumbnail is marketing; the billing screen is the truth.

I don't think five messages can tell you much about a companion. You learn the greeting, the tone of the first reply and maybe whether the character stays on topic. You don't learn memory, pacing or how the app behaves once you start paying.

So I'd use the free messages for one job only: checking whether the style of the writing suits you. Ask something a little specific, see whether the answer reads like a person or a brochure, and stop there. The rest of the decision rests on the paid plans and the reviews.

The free vs paid table sets the two sides next to each other. The gap is wide on purpose, and it is the same design most companion apps in this price range use: the free side exists to point at the paid side.

If you reach the limit and feel curious rather than annoyed, that is the moment to read the pricing and token sections below. Curiosity is exactly what the sale banners are built to catch.

Doing the math out loud: a full year on the 12-month plan costs less than four months on the monthly plan. A quarter on the 3-month plan costs a little less than two months on the monthly one. The discount curve is steep, and it is built to make the monthly price look like the penalty option.

Premium includes unlimited text messages. That sounds generous, and for text it is. The catch is that text is the cheap part of this product, and the media that the home page promotes runs on tokens, which the next section covers.

Candy.ai accepts card and crypto payments. A card at least leaves a trail you can dispute and a statement name you can look up. I'd use a card, keep the receipt e-mail and note the renewal date the day you pay.

Is the step up worth it?

I'd not take the yearly plan on day one, however good the per-month number looks. A year is a long commitment to a product whose real cost depends on how much media you buy. One month at the full price is the honest test, and it tells you whether you'd be a light user or a token buyer.

If you already know the app and you only chat, the yearly plan is the best value on the page. If the pictures and videos are the reason you are here, the plan price is just the cover charge, and the 2025 spending table shows how that played out.

I had done the exact same thing the first time around, which my subscriptions spreadsheet pointed out. A spreadsheet can't raise an eyebrow, but that row came close. The monthly price I paid in 2025 is the same monthly price the plan table shows today; the tokens are what changed my bill.

Chips, not coins

The Malta registration made me think of online casinos, which is a lot of what's registered there. The token packs felt like chips too. You buy them with real money, they turn into a softer number on the screen, and the softer number is easier to spend.

A job ad later made that feeling look less like paranoia. A CRM job ad at EverAI mentions 'token purchases'. The same ad gives bonus points for experience with 'token, credit, virtual-currency, bonus, or repeat-deposit models', an iGaming-style approach to making money.

I'd not call that a scandal; it is a business model, and a common one. But I'd go in knowing that the people designing the token side come from the same playbook as the chips. Set a monthly ceiling before the first purchase, not after the second.

The sale that never seems to end

Logged out, Candy.ai shows a 'SALE 70% OFF / JOIN NOW' banner. The sidebar shows a 'Premium -70%' badge. The banner currently carries a seasonal autumn label for 2026.

I'd read that 70% as the yearly plan's standard discount in a seasonal costume. The 12-month price on the pricing page is itself listed as 70% off the monthly rate, so the sale and the plan look like the same number. A countdown or a season name changes the mood, not the maths.

Candy.ai's terms also mention discretionary bonus-token rebates for selected spenders. That is the casino comp in a different outfit: the more you spend, the more the house may hand back, at its own choice. I'd never count a discretionary bonus as part of the price.

Bonuses shown after sign-up could not be checked, because of the captcha on the sign-up form. So I can't say what a new account gets offered in its first days, only that the job ad expects offers to exist.

My rule for these deals is simple. Decide the plan first, then look for the discount, never the other way round.

No technical details about EverGuard are public. A name without a spec sheet is a lens with no focal length printed on it. It may be excellent, but I can't tell you what it does, and neither can the company's own site.

What the product allows

Candy.ai's terms are for adults only. Candy.ai itself is an adult product through and through, with adult images and videos and, per a job ad, uncensored models. A CRM job ad says the hire must be comfortable with a product category that includes 'products powered by uncensored AI models and content'.

Themes and characters

Some Candy.ai Shorts series lean on step-family, caretaker and classroom role themes, according to the site's Candy AI notes. All Candy.ai characters are listed as adults.

I'd like EverGuard to explain how those themes are checked. A label on a character is a promise, not a process, and a moderation system that the public can't inspect asks for a lot of trust.

My read on the settings

For an adult who knows what Candy.ai is, the settings do what the terms say. For anyone who wants a companion without adult content, this is the wrong company, and no setting changes the catalogue around you.

What I'd want from EverAI is simple. Publish what EverGuard checks, how often it fails and what happens when a user reports something, the way a good camera maker publishes test charts.

Who you are paying

I read the terms of service the way I read every wedding contract, which is twice. Candy.ai's ToS named EverAI Limited, a company registered in Malta, as the operator. So the billing name was just the corporate parent, not a stranger with my card number.

The operator entity shown on everai.ai is EverAI Limited, number C107181, Malta. Candy.ai's legal pages name the same company, EverAI Limited, Malta, C107181. Bellingcat also reported in Jan 2025 that Candy.ai's terms name EverAI Limited.

Law, refunds and your content

Candy.ai's terms apply Maltese law and Maltese courts. If a dispute ever goes formal, it goes to Malta, which is a long way to travel over a subscription. In practice, that makes your bank's dispute process the more realistic route.

The terms give a 24-hour refund window. That is shorter than most return policies on a pair of shoes. I'd treat every purchase as final unless you notice a problem the same day.

Candy.ai's terms license user content for model training. I read that as a plain instruction: nothing typed into the chat is only yours anymore. I'd leave out real names, addresses, clients and anything I'd not put on a postcard.

The corporate site's own policies

everai.ai has no terms of service. Its Privacy Policy is dated 'Last Updated: January 10th, 2024', and so is its Cookies Policy.

Both policies cover only the corporate website. The privacy text says so directly: 'This Privacy Policy applies to the EverAI website'. It covers log data and cookies.

Contact data sent through the Google Form is 'used only for the purpose of responding to your inquiries'. The policy states: 'EverAI will not rent or sell potentially personally-identifying and personally-identifying information to anyone.' The policy text also refers to 'everai.com' rather than everai.ai.

That last detail is small, but it is the kind of thing an editor notices for a living. A policy that names a different domain than the site it sits on is a continuity error, the paperwork version of a prop that changes colour between takes.

What it adds up to

For a Candy AI customer, the policies that matter are Candy.ai's, not EverAI's. The corporate privacy policy protects people who fill in the contact form, and nothing more. The terms table sums up the clauses that do matter, in plain words.

The sign-up wall

E-mail sign-up on Candy.ai is gated by a reCAPTCHA checkbox, re-checked on 23 September 2026. For that reason the check created no Candy.ai account, and no e-mail from EverAI or Candy.ai arrived. After clicking Create Account, Candy.ai shows a reCAPTCHA v2 'I'm not a robot' checkbox and the message '*Please verify the Captcha'.

A captcha keeps bots out, and most people click through it in a second. It also means an outsider hits a wall before seeing the product, which fits a business that shows little until you pay.

If EverAI handed me its website for a week, I'd add one line to the homepage: the product's name and a link to it. That single cut would answer most of the nervous questions that start at a bank statement.

It is also best for partners and affiliates. Candy.ai's affiliate program is reached from the sidebar 'Affiliate' link, which opens a Pipedrive web form. The company is also best for job seekers, given how many roles it lists.

As a consumer product through Candy.ai, it is best for adults who want a polished, video-heavy AI girlfriend product. I'd add one condition: set a spending ceiling before the first token purchase, because the polish is what makes the money go.

It is not for users who want companions without adult content. No setting turns the catalogue into something else.

It is not for users who want transparent moderation details. EverGuard is a name without a spec sheet, and I can't recommend trusting a system nobody outside the company can inspect.

And it is not for privacy-sensitive users, since Candy.ai's terms license chats for model training. If the thought of your late-night conversations training a model bothers you, that is reason enough to pass.

I had. I'd gone back to Candy AI three months earlier, on a slow Sunday in January, and the renewal had simply kept rolling. The name on the statement didn't match the name on the app, and that mismatch had me reaching for the bank's fraud line before I checked my own inbox.

How it ended

I cancelled. Seeing a corporate name I didn't recognize made the whole thing feel less personal. A fictional companion I'd been chatting with was, legally speaking, a Maltese limited company, and it is hard to feel wanted by a company number.

The spell broke in one line of a bank app, and no amount of good lighting in the pictures could fix that for me.

The statement name, then and now

My charge in April 2025 read 'EverAI Ltd'. As of 23 September 2026, Candy.ai says charges show as 'EverAI' on bank statements. A Candy AI reviewer at aigirlfriend.coach, checked on 20 September 2026, saw the charge as 'EverAI LIMITED' on the card statement.

Renewal and what to do before paying

Candy.ai subscriptions renew automatically. That is standard, and it is also exactly how a slow Sunday turns into an April surprise. I'd put the renewal date in a calendar the day you pay, with a reminder a few days ahead.

Before you pay

I'd search the operator's name before the first payment, not after the first surprise. A companion app that bills under a parent company is normal; not knowing the parent's name is what turns a routine renewal into a fraud scare.

Then I'd set the reminder a few days before the renewal date. That buffer gives you time to decide calmly, instead of deciding at the checkout counter when the card is declined somewhere else.

While you use it

I'd pick the plan by the kind of user you are. Someone who mostly chats gets the most from a long plan; someone who wants the pictures should budget for tokens first and treat the plan price as a starting number.

When you leave

Cancel in the app, then check the next statement for any trailing charge. And keep in mind that a companion's memory, name and backstory all belong to an account at a company in Malta, which is a good reason to keep anything precious off it in the first place.

Memory is mixed as well. A companion that celebrates the same birthday twice holds facts but loses the context around them.

The free tier is weak: a handful of messages is a sample, not a way to use the app. Value for money is weak for anyone who buys media, because tokens turn a plan price into a starting bid.

Images and video are the strong suit, and the company clearly invests there. Privacy and terms score low: chats train models, refunds close fast and disputes go to Malta.

Cancelling and billing land in the middle. The descriptor is disclosed, but it still surprises people. Content settings are mixed, since EverGuard is a name without public detail.

So the honest answer to "is EverAI better or worse than Candy AI?" is that they are the same thing seen from two angles. Candy AI is the storefront, and EverAI is the company that owns the building, signs the leases and sends the bill.

Where it looks worse is transparency about the product. A corporate site that never names its own app, and a moderation system that exists only as a name, ask the customer to connect the dots alone.

The side-by-side table shows the app periods and plans. For anything about chat, memory, images or the builder, the Candy AI review is the page to compare against other apps.

More on this site: the best AI girlfriend apps, free AI chat apps, the best AI companion apps, AI roleplay chat apps, all AI companion app reviews.

EverAI itself is not a villain in this story. It is a company with named founders, a registered address and a product that looks good and costs more than it first appears. What it lacks is the one sentence that would have saved me a fraud scare: "this is who we are, and this is what we make."

If you came here from a statement, you now know whose charge it is. What you do with that is the part no company can decide for you, which is the only part of this whole business I'd call reassuring.