AIMOUR AI Review: Talking Portraits, Ordinary Chat and a Renewal Trap

My one-line version: the video is the product, the chat is the wrapping paper, and the billing is the part that bites. I'd pay for AIMOUR only to watch a portrait blink and talk, and only with a reminder set before the card goes in.

The thing I remember most is not a feature. I kept thinking that this tech will be in real estate ads within two years, and as the guy who currently makes those ads, I'm not sure how I feel about that. For companion software, making a working editor nervous about his own invoices is an odd kind of compliment.

Outside opinion is thin. Trustpilot shows 3.1/5 on 6 reviews in the last 12 months. That is a dinner party, not a poll, so I'd read those reviews for patterns rather than for the score.

Most of the outside detail in this review comes from two places: GenFindr's review of AIMOUR and the app's Trustpilot page. I read them as background, not as a replacement for my own month.

So who is it for? Someone curious about talking-photo video, fine with paying for a trial, and disciplined about calendars. Anyone who wants a free tier, a deep text companion or a refund safety net should keep walking.

Key takeaways: - The photo-to-video clips are the reason to pay; the text chat is pleasant and forgettable. - The short paid trial rolls into a monthly plan, and the refund policy calls every payment final. - Prices hide behind a verified login, so outside reviews and bank statements do the talking. - From a US state with an age-check law, the app now asks for a selfie age check before anything opens. - It runs in the browser only, which works fine once it is pinned to a phone's home screen.

Three days sounded like plenty. A trial, to me, is a location scout: check the light, find the power outlets, decide whether the shoot is worth booking. The problem with a short scout is that the booking happens by itself if you forget to call back.

I ran the whole thing in my phone's browser, pinned to the home screen, because there is no store app. The first days went on the photo-to-video feature, the one part of AIMOUR that made me sit up. The text chat filled the gaps while the clips cooked.

Then day four arrived, and with it a monthly charge I had forgotten was coming. Since I'd paid anyway, I used the month instead of sulking about it, and that month is where most of this review comes from. The accidental part is the honest part: I did not choose the long version, the calendar chose it for me.

I ended on the monthly plan and cancelled near the end of it with alarms set, like a man who has been burned once and would like to avoid a sequel. Nothing broke along the way. The app simply did what it was built to do, which includes collecting a renewal from people like me.

Looking back, the shape of my use says a lot about the product. It is built for a quick "wow" and a slow bill: the good part lands in the first hour, and the cost lands on day four. I'd call that the business model rather than an accident.

The table below has the dates, the plan and the outcome in one place. The sections after it go through sign-up, the characters, the chat, the video and the paperwork, in roughly the order a new user meets them.

It's browser-only, no store app, so I added it to my iPhone home screen and it looked like an app if you squinted. That trick is a bookmark in a nicer coat. It gave me an icon to tap and a full-screen view, and after a day I stopped noticing the difference.

A web app has one advantage I appreciate in this category: no store review, no update prompts, and nothing in the phone's app list for a curious relative to find. The trade is that everything depends on the site staying up and staying at the same address.

No store app, whatever the Terms say

The record lists the web as the only platform. That matches my July and August, when the browser was the only way in. It does not match the paperwork, though, because the Terms still refer to AIMOUR apps for Android and iOS.

As of 23 September 2026, no app-store links are found anywhere on the site. An iTunes search for "aimour" returns only unrelated apps: AiMOR by HOTSALES GLOBAL TRADE LLC and Aimora AI Girlfriend Simulator by Origin Labs s.r.o.. So the Terms describe apps that the stores do not show.

I'd treat that gap as a warning about lookalikes rather than a missing feature. When a brand has no store listing, anything with a similar name in the store is somebody else's product. My advice is plain: use the web address above and ignore any app that claims to be AIMOUR.

The sign-up form today

The sign-up popup asks for three things: Email, Password and Confirm password. There is also a "Continue with Google" button for anyone who would rather not type. Logging in later works the same two ways, with an email and password or with Google.

I'd skip the Google button for an app like this. Linking a main account costs you nothing today and could cost you an awkward email later. A separate address and a password manager take a minute and keep the app out of the inbox you use for work.

There is a catch in the order of things. As of 23 September 2026, the sign-up popup sits behind the age overlay, so the form cannot be used before the age check is passed. In practice the first screen of the web app is a gate, not a form, and the content-settings section below explains what that gate asks for.

Languages

The site is available in English, French, German and Spanish. That is a short list next to some rivals, but it covers the markets the pricing talk seems aimed at. I'd read it as a company that knows its customers rather than one that is trying to be everywhere.

My overall read of the first night is simple. The front door is fast once it is open, and the home-screen shortcut is good enough that the missing store app never bothered me. What slows a new visitor down today is the gate in front of the door, not the door itself.

Two examples give the flavour: "Harper, 25, Policewoman" with 32.1K, and "Caihong, 30, Journalist" with 503.8K. The gap between those numbers is large, and I'd take the rating as a popularity count rather than a quality grade. A card with half a million on it tells you what people clicked, not what they enjoyed.

The navigation has six stops: Feed, Models, Create character, Chats, Media and My Collections. The order says a lot. Browsing and media get as much room as chatting, which fits an app that sells itself on pictures and clips first.

What is on the shelves

AIMOUR offers both realistic and anime-style models, and the anime side includes drawn adult material. It also offers male and trans companions, so the library is not only for one kind of customer. I count that range as a plus; plenty of apps in this category stock one aisle and call it a store.

The category list goes further. It includes an AI boyfriend section, a trans category under an old label I won't repeat, a pregnancy category, a plus-size category, an anime category and a multi-character category. The label on the trans category is a small thing that tells you who wrote the navigation and who they wrote it for.

The multi-character idea is visible in the feed too. One example is a pair card that reads "Chaya and Nora, 25, Strippers". It is a shared persona rather than a group chat, and it tells you the tone of the catalogue better than any tagline.

My verdict on the library: wide, loud and built for scrolling. It is good at showing faces and poor at describing people. If you want to choose a companion by temperament, the cards give you a job title and a hobby, and the rest is guesswork.

The relationship meter

What made the chat feel different was the scoring. There's a relationship-progression mechanic, so it feels gamified. You unlock more closeness as you chat, like leveling up in a dating sim.

As of 23 September 2026, the site describes this as a "relationship progression" mechanic that unlocks content. So the closeness is a progress bar, and the bar is attached to what you can see. That design explains a lot about why the chat never tried very hard: the reward for talking is access, not the talk itself.

I'd rather have a companion that earns attention with good replies than one that hands out levels. A progress bar is honest about the transaction, I'll give it that. It also makes every "how was your day" feel like a coin dropped into a machine.

There is a practical side too. A meter that unlocks content gives the app a reason to keep you typing, and typing is cheap for the company and slow for you. I'd rather it gated nothing and let the replies do the work.

Limits that shape the talk

Outside reviews explain some of the flatness. aigirlfriendscout.com reports that messages are limited to 125 characters. That is roughly a text message with good manners, and it leaves no real room for a reply with any shape to it.

The same site reports that roleplay scenarios are short and jump straight to action. I'd call that a trailer without a film. For someone who wants a slow story with setup and payoff, both of those reports point the same way: this is not the app for it.

One chat per character

The FAQ says users can chat with multiple models at the same time, in separate chats. No group chat inside one conversation is mentioned. The multi-character cards in the library are a shared persona, not a room where several characters talk to you and to each other.

For my month it did not matter much, because the chat was never the main event. For anyone coming from apps with lively group scenes, it will feel like a step back.

Before the first message

On 23 September 2026, no chat is possible before the age check is passed. From the regions where that check is mandatory, a new visitor meets the gate before a single line of dialogue. That makes the first impression of the chat a form, not a character.

My overall judgement: the chat is a supporting actor. It is polite, it is capped and it is tied to a meter.

If the conversation is why you want a companion, I'd spend the money somewhere that treats talking as the main event. If you are here for the video, as I mostly was, the chat is enough to keep the lights on between clips.

I'd treat that sentence as a promise with no spec sheet. In video terms, it is a client saying the grade will "feel warmer over time" without telling you which settings change. It may be true, but you cannot check it and you cannot plan around it.

GenFindr is more specific. It reports basic memory and customization, with context kept between sessions. Basic is the key word: context between sessions is the minimum a companion needs to feel like the same person tomorrow, not a feature to shop for.

I can't give memory a confident first-hand grade. My month was about video, and the chat stayed at small talk, so it never asked the app to remember anything difficult.

Small talk forgives a lot. A companion only has to remember your name to handle "how was your day".

The relationship meter adds a twist. When closeness is a level, the app has a reason to track your history, even if it does not explain what it keeps. That is another reason I'd like the memory rules in writing rather than in a slogan.

Lip-sync is the kind of job that eats hours in an edit suite. Here a web app did a passable version while I waited, and that was the moment the trial stopped being a curiosity.

An editor's notes on the clips

As someone who shoots staged apartments, I found the lip-sync unsettlingly good on close-ups and odd at the edges. Earrings sometimes wobbled independently. That wobble is the tell: the face is the part the model understands, and everything hanging off it is along for the ride.

In my world that is a continuity error. A client would spot it on the second viewing and ask for a fix, and there would be no fix to give. On a phone screen, at a glance, most people would never see it.

Renders took noticeably longer than photos, so I'd send a request, go edit a listing, and come back to a talking face. I didn't mind the wait. It felt like a render queue at work, and I know how to fill that kind of wait.

The listing video

Since I'd paid, I used the month. I made her "present" one of my listings on video, and a realtor I shoot for said it was better than her actual walkthrough pitch. I took that as a compliment to the software and an insult to nobody in particular.

Photos and voice

The home page FAQ says users can exchange AI photos and unlock the adult photos through premium access; its own words are "you can exchange AI photos and unlock NSFW photos through premium access". The app has a feed and a Media tab, so pictures have their own shelf rather than living only inside chats.

Per the Terms, paid features include voice messages. The marketing copy promotes "sexy voice messages". The official pages mention "personalized voice messages" only, and no live voice calls were found.

aigirlfriendscout.com reports that the voice sounds natural, with tone shifts. I'd call voice messages the audio version of the photo feature: a finished product delivered to you, not a live conversation. If you want to talk out loud in real time, AIMOUR does not offer that on the official pages.

My verdict on media: the video is the best reason to open AIMOUR, and the only one I'd pay for. It is a real product with real flaws, which puts it ahead of most things in this category that are only a pitch.

After the trial period, you can subscribe...". It does not say how long the trial lasts or whether it costs anything.

The Terms add a second idea, a "Free Use" program with limited access. The company reserves the right to deny the free use to anyone. I'd read that as a free sample the shop can take back off the counter whenever it likes.

Free-tier limits are not published. There is no page that says how many messages, photos or clips a free account gets, which is the first thing I'd want to know before spending an evening on it.

The sign-up tokens are a small mystery. ohgirlfriend.com reports 300 free tokens, aigirlfriendscout.com reports 350 coins, and a search summary of a 2026 review says 500 tokens. Three sources, three numbers: the kind of spread I'd expect from three witnesses at a fender bender.

ohgirlfriend.com also reports that free tokens run out quickly once media is used. That fits the pattern. The part of AIMOUR worth seeing is the media, and the media is the part that eats the free balance.

My take

I'd treat the free side as a preview of the feed and nothing more. It may show you the character cards and the interface, and it will not show you the video, which is the thing you came for.

Free, here, is a window display. The goods are real, the glass is thick, and the door has a price on it.

If you are deciding whether to pay, the free tier will not answer the question. The trial will, and the trial comes with the renewal problem covered in the cancel section. My advice is to decide in advance what you want to see, see it, and leave the same day.

I don't like pricing pages that hide. A diner that keeps the menu in the back kitchen until you have sat down is not doing it for your benefit. The same goes for a subscription.

That monthly figure matches the charge on my own statement, covered in the cancel section, so on this point the outside review and my bank agree. Per GenFindr, the $13.99/month price applies to Tier-1 countries, and prices are lower in other regions. Where you live changes what you pay, which is one more reason the hidden pricing page is a problem.

The plans reported by ohgirlfriend.com

ohgirlfriend.com, in a page modified on 2026-02-27, lists a 3-day trial at $3.99 with 400 tokens. It lists the 1-month plan at $13.99 with 2,100 tokens, shown as about 50% off $27.99; its own words are "1‑Month Plan: $13.99 (~50% save, instead of $27.99)". The "instead of" price is the kind of strikethrough I'd ignore, since nobody seems to pay it.

The same site lists the 3-month plan at $32.99 with 3,297 tokens. It lists the 1-year plan at $98.99 with 13,188 tokens. On those figures, the long plans are cheaper per month than the monthly plan, which is the usual trade: less per month, more money gone on day one.

What the plans are called and what they add

The Terms describe paid "AIMOUR Pro" subscriptions billed monthly, semi-annually or annually. They define "AIMOUR Pro" as a subscription-fee based program which gives full access to the Services. Per the Terms, paid features include unblurred adult photos and videos.

Note the mismatch. The Terms mention semi-annual billing, while the outside list shows a 3-month plan and no six-month plan. I'd take that as a sign that the plan menu has changed over time and the paperwork has not kept up.

Is the step up worth it?

For me, one month was enough to see everything worth seeing. The trial shows the video, the monthly plan gives you time to play with it, and the long plans only make sense if the video trick stays fresh for a year.

I doubt it would. My advice: take the trial with a calendar reminder, and only move up if you still want the clips after the first week.

So the tokens are real, and the price list for them is not public. I'd call that a vending machine with the labels scraped off: it takes coins, it gives you things, and you learn the rates by pressing buttons.

aigirlfriendscout.com gives one concrete rate. It says each character costs 300 coins to unlock, and you get 350 coins just for signing up. If that is right, the sign-up gift buys roughly one character and some change, which is a welcome mat rather than a free tier.

What the Trustpilot reviews say

Two Trustpilot reviews show how the token side feels from the customer end. One mentions a double charge in plain terms: "Got Charged twice instead, but only recived the tokens once". Another says "scrolling thru the feeds took all my credits".

The second one worries me more. If browsing the feed spends credits, then the window shopping costs money, and the shop does not say so on the door. I'd check the balance after every session in the first week.

My advice on cost: budget for the subscription, then assume the tokens will want more. Keep screenshots of each purchase, because the refund policy covered later leaves very little room for mistakes.

It isn't. The countdown restarts at about 10 minutes; on 23 September 2026 it read 09:54, then 09:50 on a later load, so it appears to be a perpetual urgency timer.

A deadline that resets itself is not a deadline. It is a clock drawn on the wall.

I'd ignore the timer completely. Real limited offers tend to say what they apply to and when they end, and this banner does neither. "Up to" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, and it will be doing it again tomorrow.

The sign-up side is even harder to judge. As of 23 September 2026, in-app sign-up bonuses or tokens are not visible without passing the age check. So whatever welcome bonus exists sits behind the same gate as everything else, and the only way to see it is to go through.

My advice on deals: compare the price you actually see after logging in with the outside figures in the pricing section, not with the banner. If the trial is the deal on offer, remember that its real price includes the renewal that follows. A discount on a plan you did not mean to keep is not a saving.

The home page also includes sexual sample voice text and adult category names. None of this is subtle, and I'd rather an app be clear than coy. You know what the shop sells before you walk in.

The adult side is unfiltered on paid tiers, but honestly the video novelty grabbed me more than anything spicy. Elena mostly wanted to see the tech anyway.

That says more about me than about the app. The settings exist for people who want them. For me the lip-sync was the attraction, and the rest was background noise.

The landing pages that worry me

The www sitemap contains search landing pages whose addresses promise sexual material about celebrities and face-swapped real people; the pages themselves were not opened. Those slugs are at odds with the usual bans on real-person content. I'd count that as a red flag about how the company markets, whatever the app itself allows.

Marketing pages are not the app, and nothing here says what those pages contain. Still, a company picks its search terms on purpose, and these are the terms I'd least like to see next to a product that invites you to upload faces.

The age check: two versions, two dates

The age check depends on where you are, and it has two versions on record. When the site's record was compiled earlier in September 2026, the home page had a click-through prompt with yes and no buttons, and no ID check was described there. That is the classic honour system.

On 23 September 2026, the web app showed something stricter. A full-screen overlay said that this kind of content needs an age check in the visitor's country, and it offered two ways forward: log in with an account that has already passed, or take the check. The overlay appeared for a visitor located in Columbus, Ohio, US.

So the check is strict and geo-based, with the AgeGO selfie in regulated regions. I used the paid tiers in July and August 2026; on 23 September 2026 a visitor from a US state with an age-check law faces a face scan before seeing a single card. Both versions can be true at once: the home page prompt for most places, the selfie for regulated ones.

The Terms state the rule behind it. Nobody below 18 may use the Services, with or without registering. The list of banned user content includes abuse material involving anyone below the age of majority, whether real or fictional.

My judgement: the rules on paper are clear, and the selfie check is a serious one. I'd still like the marketing to match the rules.

Clear rules with a strict check are the right way round. A loose check with vague rules would worry me more, and plenty of rivals manage exactly that.

Who runs it

The operator is ADS BOOST LTD, registered in Cyprus under HE 431912. The company address is Prodromou 75, Oneworld Parkview House, 4th floor, 2063 Nicosia. The footer also says "Copyright © 2025 AIMOUR, Inc.", so the brand and the billing company carry different names.

That split matters when a charge shows up on a statement, as the friction and cancel sections explain. I'd save the company name and the registration number somewhere before paying.

A Cyprus company behind a brand with an Inc. line in its footer is not unusual in this business. It does mean that any dispute runs through a company in another country, under paperwork it wrote itself.

The brand has an X account, x.com/aimour_app, a Discord server, an Instagram account, instagram.com/aimour.ai, and a Medium blog, medium.com/@aimour. None of that proves good service. It does show a company that expects to be around next year.

Refunds

The Refund Policy, updated July 16, 2026, says "All payments are final and non-refundable". The no-refund rule covers unused periods, forgotten cancellations, dissatisfaction and "accidental purchases or renewals". The Terms repeat it for web sales: a subscription bought through Stripe, PayPal or another processor is final and will not be refunded.

That covers my case exactly. A forgotten trial that turns into a month is, by the company's own definition, not their problem. I agree it was my fault; I'd still call a policy that names accidental renewals as non-refundable a policy written with renewals in mind.

EU and EEA buyers waive the 14-day withdrawal right at checkout through an unchecked checkbox. Goodwill refunds are only case by case, for example for a technical failure or a duplicate charge. Case by case means no promise.

In practice the refund policy makes the trial the most expensive decision in the app. Every other choice can be undone by cancelling; a renewal that has already gone through cannot.

Disputes

The Terms contain a mandatory binding arbitration clause. They also contain a class-action waiver. In plain terms: if something goes wrong, you argue alone and in private, not in court and not with other customers.

I'd call that standard for the industry and bad for the customer. It is the clause that makes the refund policy stick, because there is nowhere else to take the argument.

Your content and your data

Users grant AIMOUR a "nonexclusive, worldwide, royalty-free ... perpetual, irrevocable license" to their content. That license includes use for "promotion, advertising or marketing". I'd think hard before uploading any photo of a real face.

So chats are off the table for marketing, while content you upload falls under a license that allows it. I'd read those two clauses side by side before sending any photo.

The Terms also mention a "Virtual-Vision" feature, whose user images are "processed in volatile memory only, irreversibly tokenised, and never stored". That is a strong promise for one feature and does not cover the rest.

The site shares data with ad partners through cookies. An opt-out of "selling/sharing" is offered.

Data is processed in Cyprus. The privacy policy keeps personal information "for only as long as necessary to fulfill the purposes we collected it for", which is standard wording that sets no clock.

Cookies for ad partners are common on the open web. On a companion site, I'd use the opt-out on the first visit and not think twice about it.

Content rules

The site has a "Content Removal & Complaints Policy". It also has an 18 U.S.C.

2257 exemption statement. Those are the documents a serious adult business keeps on file, and I'd count their presence in AIMOUR's favour.

For anyone uploading photos, the license clause is the one to reread twice. Most of this paperwork protects the company from customers; that clause protects its right to use what customers bring.

My summary of the terms: thorough, clearly written and firmly on the company's side. Read the refund policy before the trial, not after, because after is too late.

Without that check, only the public landing site and the blurred app feed behind the overlay can be seen. That is a shop window with the blinds half down. You can tell there is merchandise, and you cannot see any of it.

Billing complaints

The Trustpilot complaints form a pattern. They mention double charges. They mention unrecognised "ADS BOOST LTD" charges. They mention difficulty cancelling.

The unrecognised charges make sense once you know the billing company's name is not the brand's. I'd save the company name somewhere before paying, so the statement line never looks like a stranger used the card. The double charges and the cancelling complaints are harder to explain away.

The timer that never ends

The countdown discount banner never runs out, a standing urgency pattern. It resets itself and starts again, like a parking meter that tops itself up whenever you are about to leave. Once you know that, it is just decoration.

My overall read

None of these are show-stoppers on their own. Together they add up to an app that makes the good part easy to reach once you are in and makes everything around it harder than it needs to be.

The gate hides the product, the pricing hides behind the gate, and the timer pretends there is no time to think. I'd take the time anyway.

It also suits users who are fine with a paid trial-to-subscription model. That means people who pay for a short trial, decide within days, and either stay on purpose or cancel on purpose. People who forget, like me, pay for the lesson.

Who should skip it

AIMOUR is not for users wanting a free tier. The free side is thin and unpublished, and the good part costs money from the start.

It is not for users wanting refund protection. Every payment is final on paper, including accidental renewals.

It is not for users wanting privacy from biometric age checks. In some places the face scan is the only way in, and no alternative is offered there.

It is not for users wanting safe-for-work companionship. The whole product is built around adult media, and the calmer chat is a side dish.

And it is not for users wanting deep text roleplay control. Short messages and quick scenarios leave no real room for a long story.

My short version: AIMOUR is for a specific, curious and organised person. I'd send a video nerd there for a week. I'd send anyone looking for a companion to talk to somewhere else.

In wedding work that is a missed cue: the moment happens, you are looking the other way, and there is no second take. Three days is a short window for anyone with a job and a calendar already full of other people's deadlines.

How the charge shows up

Charges appear on bank statements as "ADS BOOST LTD (Aimour AI)". That is better than a bare company name, since the brand is at least in brackets. I'd still screenshot the descriptor and keep it next to the receipt.

Subscriptions auto-renew "automatically until canceled". The refund policy says that buying a subscription authorizes recurring charges at the interval shown at checkout, for example monthly, until you cancel. In other words, the renewal is not a reminder, it is the default.

How cancelling works today

Cancelling works via Profile > Cancel subscription. It also works by e-mailing support. Cancellation takes effect at the end of the current period, so you keep what you paid for until the paid time runs out.

The button is easy to find, and I'll credit that. The trap is not the cancelling, it is the timing, and the timing is entirely on the customer.

I cancelled on day 29 with two alarms set. The talking-apartment video lives on my laptop as a party trick. Two alarms for one button is excessive, and I'd do it again, because the policy does not forgive a missed date.

Deleting the account

Accounts can be deleted in the app, and deletion is irreversible. Deletion can also be requested by e-mail to [email protected]. The Terms say that deleting an account removes all associated data permanently.

I'd delete the account after cancelling if privacy matters to you. Cancelling stops the billing; deleting is what removes the history. Save anything you want to keep first, because there is no undo.

Cancelling and deleting are two separate jobs, like returning rental gear and closing the account at the rental house. Most people do the first and forget the second.

What I'd do before paying

Set a reminder for the second day of the trial, not the third. Write down the billing name, ADS BOOST LTD, so the charge does not surprise you. Check the price after logging in, since it varies by region.

Treat the trial as a paid screening, not a free sample. You are buying a look at the video, and the look is worth it only if you leave on time.

Second, go straight to the video. The talking portrait is the reason to be there, and it takes a while to render, so start a clip early and do something else while it cooks. The chat will still be there when you come back.

Third, look at the actual price after logging in before you pay. My statement said $13.99 a month, and GenFindr says prices vary by region, so the number on your screen is the only one that counts.

Fourth, keep a record. Screenshot the price, the checkout page and the first statement line, and note the billing company's name. If a double charge happens, that is what you'll need.

Fifth, be careful with real faces. The content license is broad, so I'd only upload photos you own and would not mind seeing again somewhere unexpected.

Finally, cancel when you are done, not when you plan to be done. The gap between those two moments is where the renewal lives.

Images and voice score highest. The talking portrait is the best thing in the app, with lip-sync that holds up on close-ups and wobbles at the edges. Voice messages add to it, but there are no live calls.

Memory is hard to grade, because the app does not describe it and outside sources only call it basic.

The free tier scores poorly. Its limits are unpublished, it can be refused, and the good part costs money.

Value for money is mixed. One month of video play is fair for a curious person; a forgotten renewal with no refunds is not.

Privacy and terms land in the middle: complete paperwork, a broad content license and a selfie check in some places.

Cancelling and billing score low for the trial trap and the no-refund policy, even though cancelling itself is simple. Content settings are clear on paper, with a gate that is strict where the law requires it.

It loses on almost everything else. The chat is thinner than the text-first apps, the memory is undescribed, and the free side is a locked door compared with apps that let you talk for days before paying. If conversation is your reason for a companion, the table will point you somewhere better.

The billing also sets it apart, in the wrong direction. A short paid trial that rolls into a month with no refunds is a harder deal than a plain monthly price with an obvious cancel button. I'd rather pay more for a price I can see than less for one that hides behind a login.

My rule of thumb: pick AIMOUR for a short, deliberate look at talking-photo video. Pick almost anything else for a companion you want to keep.

More on this site: the best AI girlfriend apps, free AI chat apps, the best AI companion apps, AI roleplay chat apps, all AI companion app reviews.

If you go, go on purpose. Know what you want to see, see it, and cancel before the calendar decides for you.

And if you end up with a clip of a stranger's face selling your own work back to you, keep it. It makes a decent party trick, and a better warning.

The trick will get better and cheaper, and it will turn up in places far from companion apps. I'd rather meet it on purpose, in a deliberate trial, with the renewal date already in the calendar.